Article doesn't make sense to me. It spends time on silly stats like # of total sats per GNSS constellation, without saying why we should care. They complain t

Article doesn't make sense to me. It spends time on silly stats like # of total sats per GNSS constellation, without saying why we should care. They complain that even with the new signals, GPS still transmits on the same OG frequency it always has, but doesn't say why that's bad (it can't be that bad of a frequency since Galileo chose to use the same one) IMO GPS is the gold standard because it's reliable. There's been accuracy issues and other glitches, but I don't think there's been any global outages in the last 50 years. Hell, just having no outages in the last decade already puts it ahead of Galileo and GLONASS.