you either have free speech or you don't. I get the censorship argument - every socieity observes speech taboos - explicit or implicit - and we all seem to agr

you either have free speech or you don't. I get the censorship argument - every socieity observes speech taboos - explicit or implicit - and we all seem to agree that there are certain things, in certain cases, that cannot be said. However, what these things are, are different to different countries and in different contexts. It's when we try to universalise our position that we run into dissonance. If we can accept localisation rather the universalisation then I censorship can be limited to specific domains sensitive to specific groups and everyone might more or less be ok with it.