3 ms·
Maybe I read the article wrong, but my spidey sense went off when reading the article. They're comparing the maximum_complaints_per_month quantity before and af
by luser001 15y ago
Maybe I read the article wrong, but my spidey sense went off when reading the article. They're comparing the maximum_complaints_per_month quantity before and after switch. i.e., the peak value of complaints_per_month. Not average or annual.
I agree with your other points.
FTA:
The maximum number of complaints was 70 per month
before the beginning of the switch to LiMux. After the
number of LiMux workplaces increased from 1,500 to
9,500, the maximum number of complaints per month
dropped to 46.
- Xylakant 15y agoActually, that's a misinterpretation in the article. The original document mentions those figures, but in a different context: Those are the total number of complaints for limux workplaces in the beginning and in the end and it includes all kinds of errors - application errors, user errors, database and network connectivity so it's nothing but a rough upper bound. It's given as rough indicator that most problems have been solved.