The relevant part of the article. Good old Max Schrems: ---- Privacy activist Max Schrems argues that the new framework is “largely a copy” of previous ones.

The relevant part of the article. Good old Max Schrems: ---- Privacy activist Max Schrems argues that the new framework is “largely a copy” of previous ones. The US Department of Commerce also considers that it “does not create new substantive obligations for participating organizations with regards to protecting EU personal data” and “[t]he privacy principles and the process to initially self-certify and annually re-certify remain substantively the same”. Moreover, Schrems stresses that substantial changes in US surveillance law are needed for true effectiveness and has signalled his intention to bring “the new deal back before the CJEU”. A legal challenge has therefore been announced, possibly reaching the CJEU by late 2023 or early 2024 which may result in a temporary suspension of the DPF.