2 ms·
I think it sounds more like 93% (14 predicted/(14 + 1) total earthquakes). False positives aren't failures to predict an earthquake, they're a different error
by gpm 3y ago
I think it sounds more like 93% (14 predicted/(14 + 1) total earthquakes).
False positives aren't failures to predict an earthquake, they're a different error with a different consequences.
Of course, I'm not sure why I would trust the absolute numbers reported are more accurate than the percentages reported...
- bhaney 3y agoSounds good. In that case, I just made a 100% accurate model by always predicting that every location on Earth is experiencing an earthquake all the time.