4 ms·
We'll end up with a Firefox add on to bypass this. And failing that, a piratebay of YouTube videos
by idonotknowwhy 3y ago
We'll end up with a Firefox add on to bypass this.
And failing that, a piratebay of YouTube videos
- paulmd 3y agoThe entirety of HDCP exists to prevent this. That has literally been the driving factor in Secure Enclave adoption since day 1 too (along with bitlocker, but, video DRM has always been the other big one). There will always be vulnerabilities and improper implementations and workarounds, but, the entire point of secure enclave is for someone at netflix or your employer's HQ to be comfortable knowing they have a toehold in your machine that can't be broken via Remote Attestation, and that there is no way for you to get the keys out of it when it's acting as a HSM. You can always disable it/etc, or use another browser (like firefox) that doesn't provide a secure enclave. But then, google won't serve you video, just like netflix reduces the stream quality for people who don't have the hardware DRM set up right. Since 95% of the world is already using chrome anyway (other than ios), this is a pretty low-risk move.
- johnnyanmac 3y ago>a piratebay of YouTube videos that'd be infeasible to do given the sheer volume of videos uploaded per day. even if we limited it to the most subscribed creators (10m+ subs) it'd be hard for pirates to keep up. Not to mention seeding. If we had enough seeders to keep that sort of volume up, those p2p video services would be in a much better state.
- somsak2 3y agoWho even uses Pirate Bay anymore?