6 ms·
I think the presence of grammatical errors and other idiosyncrasies is a strong indicator that they aren't confabulated.
by dissahc 3y ago
I think the presence of grammatical errors and other idiosyncrasies is a strong indicator that they aren't confabulated.
- krainboltgreene 3y agoWhy? Are not grammatical errors and idiosyncrasies part of the data set that chatGPT is trained on and thus also a predictable set of tokens?
- btilly 3y agoSuch errors are rare enough that they are almost never the most likely next token. Therefore ChatGPT only makes such mistakes when it is given good reason to do so.
- krainboltgreene 3y agoChatGPT cannot reason.
- datameta 3y agoGeneral System's RetroConfabulator
- SirMaster 3y agoHow do we know they aren’t fake system prompts planted there by OpenAI to be returned to the user when people try to get them?