> They're black boxes that come up with an answer. And at their best they operate at 90 percent accuracy. Well at least the truth is right there in the article

> They're black boxes that come up with an answer. And at their best they operate at 90 percent accuracy. Well at least the truth is right there in the article. Every single “detector” that’s been going on is a heuristic and has false positives. OpenAI quietly walked back on theirs (for text). I mean, nobody should rely on these for students taking tests, let alone making judgments about war crimes. Either typical Twitter noise amplification is at fault here, and AI tooling just happens to be involved, or we have a serious education problem where people think these detectors actually work for anything. I’m leaning both.