2 ms·
But I still don't see how that form of RLHF could be fully, mechanistically reliable, which is what you'd need here. Current RLHF drastically lowers the likelih
by Michelangelo11 3y ago
But I still don't see how that form of RLHF could be fully, mechanistically reliable, which is what you'd need here. Current RLHF drastically lowers the likelihood of the LLM generating objectionable content, but it doesn't drop it to zero, because LLMs need to be highly pliant and suggestible to be useful and that leaves a window of opportunity for bad actors. How would this be any different?