3 ms·
Convincing men at basically peak testosterone production to permanently impair their natural ability to produce it. It's awful. Not to mention the side effects
by reedf1 3y ago
Convincing men at basically peak testosterone production to permanently impair their natural ability to produce it. It's awful. Not to mention the side effects of taking exogenous hormones e.g. damage to your liver...
- wredue 3y agoI see a study suggesting that, in hypogonadal men (important), TTh or TRT seems to improve their liver.
- tayo42 3y agoPeak? We're talking about 30 year olds. For some it's not really convincing. They look at it like doctor perscribed steroids.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- diath 3y agoThis seems to be contradicting your claim: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451678/
- civilitty 3y agoDid you read the study? Or even the first line of the abstract? “Hypogonadal men with hepatic steatosis” is literally in the first sentence. It’s a study on men with low testosterone and fatty liver disease. They already have damaged livers.
- diath 3y agoIf the presence of testosterone can improve the function of damaged liver, there's no reason to think that a healthy liver would get damaged by it. I can't even think of any mechanism that would be involved.
- eimrine 3y agodosis sola facit venenum? Sorry I can not say anything smarter because I can not compare the doses, but maybe someone else will compare.