4 ms·
"trivially easy to build and there are hundreds of thousands of potential sites in the US alone." Yeah, but plenty of people don't live in the US and their geo
by inglor_cz 3y ago
"trivially easy to build and there are hundreds of thousands of potential sites in the US alone."
Yeah, but plenty of people don't live in the US and their geography is much less suitable for pumped storage than the American (or Norwegian) one.
For example, Finland is very flat, so are the Baltic states and most of Poland. So is Bangladesh, which has three times as many people as all the above together, and a nascent industry that needs energy.
In Czechia, we have rolling hills that are suitable for some pumped storage, but we built up almost all the good locations. In one case, an entire top of a mountain was cut off in order to make a reservoir:
https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dlouh%C3%A9_str%C3%A1n%C4%9B_(horn%C3%AD_n%C3%A1dr%C5%BE)#/media/Soubor:Dlouhe_strane_horni_nadrz.jpg https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dlouh%C3%A9_str%C3%A1n%C4%9B_(...
- ben_w 3y agoI have a vague memory that someone suggested turning a significant fraction of what is now Czechia into a single huge hydro lake — probably one of the many mad things suggested in the inter-war period — but I can't remember the name now to search for it.
- inglor_cz 3y agoAt least we could have some mean naval battles. Our landlocked history is severely lacking those.