8 ms·
>> Wrong in what context Read above. I wrote what exactly is wrong with it. >> There's no no-context objective version here. Exactly. And that is why such te
by pk-protect-ai 3y ago
>> Wrong in what context
Read above. I wrote what exactly is wrong with it.
>> There's no no-context objective version here.
Exactly. And that is why such texts must be excluded.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.11644 https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.11644
- viraptor 3y agoI get what you wrote. What I'm saying is that including them is wrong in one context, right in another, and in some you're going to fail regardless which one you include. At that point, wrong is not wrong, but a choice.
- pk-protect-ai 3y ago>> What I'm saying is that including them is wrong in one context, right in another There is no "correct context" to include erroneous data that could mess up your weights. You're shifting the discussion into opinions territory, which is exactly this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zh3Yz3PiXZw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zh3Yz3PiXZw