>I don't think you can date a secondary trace of something like this. FTA: “One key problem in archaeology is that we are often not getting a date (radiometri

>I don't think you can date a secondary trace of something like this. FTA: “One key problem in archaeology is that we are often not getting a date (radiometric date, for example) on the objects we are directly interested in.” According to the article, secondary sources are the norm in archaeology.