3 ms·
> who wants to consume art purely generated by AI Most people won't care one bit. Some artists care strongly, hence the bans on artist-focused sites. When it's
by gaganyaan 3y ago
> who wants to consume art purely generated by AI
Most people won't care one bit. Some artists care strongly, hence the bans on artist-focused sites. When it's about as good or better than humans, people will consume it.
As for why people are still on HN, TBH a lot of these comments could be easily written by ChatGPT. What makes it worth it is seeing comments from people in the know, which is something ChatGPT can't replicate.
For your other comment about pixiv, people don't hate AI art, they hate low-effort trash. Most people, if they saw art they liked, wouldn't care who or what created it.
- mjr00 3y ago> When it's about as good or better than humans, people will consume it. How are you measuring better? AI art is already better than most humans in a lot of ways: better shading, better coloring, even better anatomy outside of hands and feet (which has been mostly solved with controlnet and related extensions). Yet nobody wants to look at it.
- gaganyaan 3y ago> Yet nobody wants to look at it. That's simply false. Lots of people are enjoying it. Especially porn of course, but people are enjoying plenty of regular AI art, right now. "Better" isn't objective, more people will enjoy more AI art as it gets better at generating art that they like. What makes you think otherwise?