3 ms·
I really like a lot of Tailscale, but I just finished implementing it for my company using headscale (I couldn't get the funding to buy from Tailscale). This i
by linsomniac 3y ago
I really like a lot of Tailscale, but I just finished implementing it for my company using headscale (I couldn't get the funding to buy from Tailscale). This is across ~200 machines.
I'll be honest: If I could do it again, I'd use Nebula. The primary issues I have are that Tailscale has a lot of magic which I can see some cases it being nice, but it does make some of the routing and firewalling I'm doing on machines, and in particular the thing where it sets up Tailscale routes to network routes as higher priority than local interfaces leads to problems in my environment.
The other thing is just Headscale itself, it works quite well but does have some rough edges. It's entirely too easy to kill your whole mesh by flubbing an ACL, and currently restarting headscale to pick up ACL changes is taking 3-5 minutes.
I do, however, really prefer the Tailscale ACLs over Nebula's.
One thing that led me to Tailscale was the ability for it to relay around network routing problems, and it looks like Nebula has added that since I started. Around the time I was evaluating Nebula vs. Tailscale we had a ~1 day network routing issue where some of my users were blackhole routed in Comcast, and Tailscale just worked around it.
- radlad 3y agoHey there - I'm an employee at [redacted] and was wondering if you'd be open to answering some questions about your experience evaluating Nebula and related products? If so, please shoot me an email at [redacted]. Thanks!