4 ms·
>GPT partition uuid's with the "mixed endianess" from Windows COM From the wikipedia[1]: >The binary encoding of UUIDs varies between systems. Variant 1 UUIDs
by 0dayz 3y ago
>GPT partition uuid's with the "mixed endianess" from Windows COM
From the wikipedia[1]:
>The binary encoding of UUIDs varies between systems. Variant 1 UUIDs, nowadays the most common variant, are encoded in a big-endian format.
>Variant 2 UUIDs, historically used in Microsoft's COM/OLE libraries, use a little-endian format, but appear mixed-endian with the first three components of the UUID as little-endian and last two big-endian, due to the missing byte dashes when formatted as a string
In other words, there are 2 variants, 2 is for Microsoft's COM/OLE, so it's not designed by Microsoft.
>ESP is the FAT filesystem, developed in 1977 for DOS
>LFS vfat extensions so the ESP can have directory entries with lowercase letters or longer than 11 characters. This also pulls in the UCS-2 encoding. Stuff from Windows 95.
FAT is not govern by Microsoft, despite them being the original author, and even then FAT32 patents have expired[2].
>EFI executables are actually windows PE executables
You would need to provide proper source for this, the only source I can only talks about boot loaders, which I would imagine is written with the OS in mind[3].
[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universally_unique_identifier#Encoding https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universally_unique_identifier#...
[2]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_Allocation_Table#Patents https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_Allocation_Table#Patents
[3]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UEFI#Applications https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UEFI#Applications
- blueflow 3y agoYou are wrong on the UUIDs, Variant 2 is what Microsoft did and got standardized after the fact. And here the history and current usage of the PE format: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_Executable https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_Executable It was made for Windows 3.1.
- 0dayz 3y agoIf you read my comment or the Wikipedia page you'll see clear as day that varient 2 is meant for windows, so I dont get this correction. And again that source doesn't give me any evidence of your claim.