3 ms·
ARIMA is very very slow and computational expensive. >Even if true, they could take a random subset of size 100 out of the 300k and compare on those. Sure...b
by nojito 3y ago
ARIMA is very very slow and computational expensive.
>Even if true, they could take a random subset of size 100 out of the 300k and compare on those.
Sure...but there's a chance that ARIMA won't even finish training on that subset either.
- wokwokwok 3y agoIt doesn’t matter. If you write a paper and exclude comparisons to state of the art, this what happens. They could have done something, and didn’t. “It’s hard so we didn’t” isn’t an excuse, it’s just a lack of rigor.