3 ms·
The difference is only one of those four examples is an internationally designated terror organization.
by dannydowonahn1 3y ago
The difference is only one of those four examples is an internationally designated terror organization.
- ffgjgf1 3y agoOne of those states is also an internationally recognized “state sponsor of terrorism” so it’s not that far off
- lucideer 3y agoAnother of those four examples is internationally designated as a violation of the 4th Geneva Convention under UNSC Resolution 2334. I don't think one can say that international condemnation is particularly unique to any of them.
- cyanydeez 3y agoIf Russia didn't usurp USSRs UN seat, they'd be designated a terrorist state.
- vetinari 3y agoRussia didn't usurp anything; they are legally USSR ancestor state. They also got all of USSR's debts.