> How the hell is this any different it is significantly different because back then Microsoft was close to being a monopoly in the relevant market. Thats the

> How the hell is this any different it is significantly different because back then Microsoft was close to being a monopoly in the relevant market. Thats the difference. Microsoft is not that in video games right now. Giving stuff away for free or cheap and bundling is completely fine if the company doing it isn't even close to being a monopoly. > than the anti-competitive behavior that Microsoft was brought to court for in the 90s? The anti competitive behavior that they were brought to court for was not bundling. Instead, it was for being close to a monopoly while also engaging in bundling. Bundling is only anti-competitive if the company doing it is close to being a monopoly.