Don't expect the corporate media to examine the CIA's more recent operations too critically (or report on them at all) - they're riddled with "ex" CIA and other

Don't expect the corporate media to examine the CIA's more recent operations too critically (or report on them at all) - they're riddled with "ex" CIA and other government agents: https://dailycaller.com/2019/08/23/cnn-msnbc-15-spooks-mccabe/ https://dailycaller.com/2019/08/23/cnn-msnbc-15-spooks-mccab... And please spare us with the excuse that they just hire subject matter experts. You would not accept such logic for Russia or China. Though the NYTimes are far from perfect or impartial, they are at least good at appearing neutral (one has to gather statistics on how they cherry-pick stories to see their well-hidden but strong bias). Their journalist ethics guidelines warn against the appearance of bias, and their reporters aren't allowed to give political donations: https://www.nytimes.com/editorial-standards/ethical-journalism.html#protectingThePapersNeutrality https://www.nytimes.com/editorial-standards/ethical-journali...