That's how I see it, also. There is a very clear pattern that prevalence of pornography reduces rape. Why in the world should we expect a different result whe

That's how I see it, also. There is a very clear pattern that prevalence of pornography reduces rape. Why in the world should we expect a different result when we narrow the context? Yucky as it is I believe the answer here is to have image-generating AIs sign their work. Something properly signed is known not to involve any actual children and would thus be legal. (My philosophy in general is that for something to be illegal the state should be able to show a non-consenting victim or the undue risk of a victim (ie, DUI). I do not believe disgusting things in private warrant a law.)