4 ms·
>It will program something for you to a certain point, then you need humans. I'm more concerned about reaching near-AGI where the "you need humans" parts are m
by gs17 3y ago
>It will program something for you to a certain point, then you need humans.
I'm more concerned about reaching near-AGI where the "you need humans" parts are more and more limited (while the number of humans is less and less limited) but our economies refuse to adapt.
- jrajav 3y agoThis is an issue with the productivity gains from automation being siphoned off in general, and we've been boiling that frog for a century plus. We're gonna have to figure out a more sophisticated economic model before too long but it will probably have to be a painful lesson.
- snowwrestler 3y agoThe number of humans is actually becoming more limited; global population growth is slowing and will cease not too long from now. So building productive systems that need fewer humans will be good for the economy in the long run. Personally I hope we never make it to AGI as I think it would raise moral and social concerns about issues like compulsion and slavery. Best to stay under that line, where tools are extremely productive but not arguably conscious beings.