3 ms·
It's not super clear from the article how this achieves such a drastic reduction in energy use. It seems that maybe they are not accounting for energy used to
by foobarian 3y ago
It's not super clear from the article how this achieves such a drastic reduction in energy use. It seems that maybe they are not accounting for energy used to dry out the desiccant at night; in that case the 60% figure might make sense during the cooling cycle only.
The opening blurb also makes no sense to me; as it is AC units already suck moisture out of the air. Ask anyone who had a clog in an AC drain line :-)
- ilyt 3y agoI'm guessing they made tiny part of whole system 60% more efficient and journalistic mispractice did the rest