3 ms·
I think it's pretty clear this is not about "CSAM", we have to stop using the term. It's just censorship, plain and simple. Client side means you'll pay from yo
by cabirum 3y ago
I think it's pretty clear this is not about "CSAM", we have to stop using the term. It's just censorship, plain and simple. Client side means you'll pay from your own pocket for this wrongthing detector to work. It can even be automated so as soon as the detector gets triggered by anything, you'll get locked out of your bank accounts, until further notice I guess.
If this thing gets a serious discussion in a parliament, get rid of the parliament.
- ramses0 3y agoBut parliament wants to seed your camera with mugshots of the FBI's top-ten most wanted list so the instant a false positive appears (directly on the camera, potentially even prior to writing the image to disk, potentially even prior to pressing the snapshot button)... they beacon an alert (or exfiltrate piggybacking via Bluetooth/AirTag/Covid exposure tracking mrchanisms), and bob's you're uncle.
- SV_BubbleTime 3y agoI’m starting to think that a government large enough to get all the things it could want might be a bad idea.
- timschmidt 3y agoI'd generalize this to any hierarchy. That includes corporations, institutions, religions, governments, cults, basically any time there are more than two people in the same room.
- morkalork 3y agoSounds like there's going to be a market for vintage cell phones built before that happens. Although eventually they'll stop being useful as gWhatever rolls out and telecom providers stop supporting 4/5g.
- INTPenis 3y agoWhat makes the debate confusing is that some people probably believe it is about CSAM. Like the Swedish PM Ylva Johansson for example. She probably believes in what she's doing, and other forces are simply taking advantage of her crusade.
- what-no-tests 3y agoThat's very generous of you.