5 ms·
An internal actor seems more likely to me, but who knows?
by a2tech 3y ago
An internal actor seems more likely to me, but who knows?
- robertlagrant 3y agoAs in an FTX staff member?
- chriscappuccio 3y agoYes
- imglorp 3y agoIf someone is willing to steal from their customers and injure innocent, random public, then it seems like a small character epsilon to also steal from their employer and its investors.
- candiodari 3y agoYou mean you think it's FBI officers, like in the Ross Ulbright case?
- chollida1 3y agoNo i don't think he means that at all. In the Ross Ulbright case the FBI got the bitcoin and then the two FBI agents stole it. In the FTX case the crypto was taken from the exchange in the days before it declared bankruptcy so the FBI was not invovled. Not sure where you read that they were. Can you provide a source for that?
- sneak 3y agoThe FBI et al are very good at surveillance. I doubt anyone close enough to SBF to be part of a criminal conspiracy would be unknown to the FBI or not under surveillance at this point.
- vuln 3y ago> would be unknown to the FBI Being _known_ by the FBI doesn’t stop crime or terror attacks. More often than not when something big happens the FBI was already tipped off, an investigation started and then somehow someway the crime/attack/incident still happens.
- paulpauper 3y agothey are good enough that afik maybe six or so hackers out of hundreds since 2013 or so have been caught. So not so good.
- sneak 3y agoHow many of those were conspiring together with a suspect already arrested and in custody?