3 ms·
I guess it comes down to this black box list of hashes that no one would want to audit for pretty obvious reasons. The authority is only as good as the person p
by graypegg 3y ago
I guess it comes down to this black box list of hashes that no one would want to audit for pretty obvious reasons. The authority is only as good as the person paid to automate the hashing process feels that day.
It’s not inconceivable that someone at the authority could put in an image known to be stored by someone else into the hash list just to cause an extremely scary and confusing month for that person.
To be fair, that’s also the same problem of say, someone at your ISP dislikes you. There’s always a chance your supplier has a “bad apple”. Maybe it’s not an issue but I get the idea.
- rootusrootus 3y ago> I guess it comes down to this black box list of hashes that no one would want to audit for pretty obvious reasons. The authority is only as good as the person paid to automate the hashing process feels that day. Isn't that exactly how it is run today, however? There are actual people at the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children who maintain the database and do in fact get incidentally exposed to the imagery. It's the one organization in the entire nation allowed to legally possess the actual images.