3 ms·
> I'm unconvinced that private, smoke-filled backrooms don't have an essential place as the grease that keeps things running well. I hear that, and there's a
by nonrandomstring 3y ago
> I'm unconvinced that private, smoke-filled backrooms don't have an
essential place as the grease that keeps things running well.
I hear that, and there's a case for it. Diplomacy, maneuvering and negotiation
require secrets and enclaves.
So to allow for that you need a few things;
- Strict official records of affairs
- Strong penalties for fraud, malinfluence, intimidation
- Whistleblower protection
The last of these essential checks-and-balances has gone to shit our
culture. Even if we pardoned Edward Snowden and made him a "hero of
democracy" tomorrow, it's still a mountain of work to restore the
essential sense of civic responsibility, patriotism and duty that
allows those people who discover or witness corruption to step-up and
challenge it safe in the knowledge that the law and common morality
are on their side.
- ethbr1 3y agoBillions (the tv show), of all places, made a somewhat similar argument in favor of post-hoc investigations, in the last episode. Record and share everything immediately = no room for deals Record nothing = too much room for corruption So we land at... record everything + only review with just cause + strict whistleblower protections. Which seems a nice splitting of the matter, but requires a strong, independent third party (e.g. judicial branch) to arbitrate access requests. With tremendous pressure and incentives to breach that limit.