4 ms·
My headcanon is that this is no different than most ToS on websites, and if those hold up to legal scrutiny, so should this. Either both are valid or neither ar
by genocidicbunny 3y ago
My headcanon is that this is no different than most ToS on websites, and if those hold up to legal scrutiny, so should this. Either both are valid or neither are.
- ceejayoz 3y agoThey are largely invalid too, which is why no one catches CFAA charges for accessing YouTube in violation of their terms.
- tzs 3y agoIt depends on how the website handles its TOS. See this article [1] for information on how a website can make its TOS legally binding. [1] https://www.upcounsel.com/are-website-terms-and-conditions-legally-binding https://www.upcounsel.com/are-website-terms-and-conditions-l...