> which from the outside can look like his points are unrefutable. Just to be sure, this is not how I see it at all. I'm relatively convinced that the thing is

> which from the outside can look like his points are unrefutable. Just to be sure, this is not how I see it at all. I'm relatively convinced that the thing isn't backdoored rather than buying into this particular conspiracy theory. But yeah, in general that is a risk when one doesn't engage despite disagreeing