3 ms·
> but they for sure don't share it as freely available standards. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8891 https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8891 (GOST Magma) is
by pgeorgi 3y ago
> but they for sure don't share it as freely available standards.
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8891 https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8891 (GOST Magma) is a russian standard block cipher.
https://www.gsma.com/aboutus/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/eea3eia3zucv16.pdf https://www.gsma.com/aboutus/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/eea3... is a Chinese stream cipher.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ribose-cfrg-sm4-10 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ribose-cfrg-sm4-... Chinese block cipher.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-oscca-cfrg-sm3-02 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-oscca-cfrg-sm3-0... Chinese hash function.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4269 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4269 (SEED) is from South Korea (aligned, but still worth a mention)