Perhaps the problem is the mismatch between the class inherent composition (static, social but might be unequal) and the personal learning itself (inherently d

Perhaps the problem is the mismatch between the class inherent composition (static, social but might be unequal) and the personal learning itself (inherently divers and dynamic). So instead of sitting in a static class, maybe the students should have their personal learning time, THEN convene per interests or social connections, for whatever they choose. This way, students will build themselves the social connections they wish. Another problem might be just the stupid statistics. 75% of any population are just followers, who only differ minimally from each other in no significant way (more in appearance than substance). Thus, 75% don’t need much personal learning beside what traditional teachers can already provide. The rest 25% can benefit greatly from personal learning and teaching but either they already doing that in some forms or they don’t build enough mass for a wider adoption.