Yes. Because XP with no ability to search the start menu is better than everything that came after it. That doesn't mean that XP was perfect. There are still f

Yes. Because XP with no ability to search the start menu is better than everything that came after it. That doesn't mean that XP was perfect. There are still faults with it. But if fixing those faults means iterating on it more, then I'm happy with not. Things can be imperfect and still better than everything else. Does that make sense?