3 ms·
> because the people who actually give a fuck about the risk NEED to have granular detail of what data, readable by whom, is stored exactly where and for how l
by Karrot_Kream 3y ago
> because the people who actually give a fuck about the risk NEED to have granular detail of what data, readable by whom, is stored exactly where and for how long, and how can you make sure, and how do you know that access is scoped to the absolute minimum number of people, and is there a paper trail for that?
You realize that Microsoft is a publicly traded company that has multiple privacy certifications? They have to subject to detailed data ownership and consumption audits. They most definitely have data ownership and retention logs and you can request for copies of their certification audits to understand how they log/track this. I think the parent is being too optimistic but your answer is so comically simplistic it's silly. I highly suggest you read about the world of HIPAA, PCI, and FedRAMP instead of just thinking "omg the data".
- mlsu 3y agoAbsolutely. I am well aware of this, as are most tech people, that's what I'm saying. It's not us that are trying to convince our orgs to build a rack in the basement "to be more secure" just because we want to hear the fans running and see the lights blinking. It's the lawyers that you need to convince. Good luck convincing any bigco lawyer that your company's data is safe on openAI because their legal agreement says "we don't train on API calls."