5 ms·

Windows 2000 might be the actual peak. It took the good parts of Windows 95 and 98 and combined them into something quite excellent. All downhill ever since.

• amanzi 3y ago
  Also took the good parts from Windows NT. I loved using Windows 2000. I remember being really mad when XP came out and it added all the colourful and curvy GUI elements - felt really dumbed down.
  • xcv123 3y ago
    > Also took the good parts from Windows NT. It is Windows NT 5.0 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_NT#Releases https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_NT#Releases
    • steve1977 3y ago
      And XP was Windows NT 5.1 (as also seen in your link)
• pmontra 3y ago
  I agree with the choice of Windows 2000. The reaction to Windows XP was that it was too videogamish with its choice of colors and bezels. Then it lasted for so many years past Vista and in part Windows 8 that it became the reference Windows interface. Then the flat UIs mimicking the web and also the 80s with simple elements (we couldn't do complicated widgets back then, not enough pixels.)
  • squarefoot 3y ago
    Win XP with classic look was pretty decent and useable. There was an option in system settings to disable all theming, 3D stuff, animations etc. just the basic look of that time and a lot more snappy UX.
    • trealira 3y ago
      Do you have a picture of what that looked like? I'm curious. When I search for it, I can only find pictures of normal Windows XP and older versions of Windows. I can only imagine it looking like Windows 95 again.
      • xcv123 3y ago
        It looked like Windows 2000. https://guidebookgallery.org/screenshots/win2000pro https://guidebookgallery.org/screenshots/win2000pro
      • squarefoot 3y ago
        Not easy to find, anyway here is a small one: http://toastytech.com/guis/wxpclassic.png http://toastytech.com/guis/wxpclassic.png Here is a blog post that explains how and why: http://softwaretracker.blogspot.com/2007/08/improve-windows-xp-or-vista-system.html http://softwaretracker.blogspot.com/2007/08/improve-windows-...
        • trealira 3y ago
          Thanks, that's exactly what I wanted. It did look slightly nicer than the Windows 95 pictures here.
      • steve1977 3y ago
        Classic style actually worked up to and including Windows 7: https://betawiki.net/images/d/da/Windows_7_classic_theme.png https://betawiki.net/images/d/da/Windows_7_classic_theme.png
        • trealira 3y ago
          Thanks for letting me know. I looked into it, and apparently it's still even possible to activate on later versions of Windows with registry edits and helper software: https://github.com/valinet/ExplorerPatcher/discussions/167 https://github.com/valinet/ExplorerPatcher/discussions/167
  • doubled112 3y ago
    I avoided the XP Luna theme as best I could when it was new, but now I look back at it and realize it was pretty good. At least I could tell where the scrollbar was.
  • nunez 3y ago
    Windows still has the Classic Theme; it's just hidden. https://old.reddit.com/r/windows/comments/11qq0qi/why_did_microsoft_get_rid_of_classic_theme/ https://old.reddit.com/r/windows/comments/11qq0qi/why_did_mi...
• codepoet80 3y ago
  Got an old Dell running Windows 2000. Its remarkable how responsive the UI is. I open an Explorer window, it paints instantly. The Start Menu pops up completely drawn in a fraction of a second. Windows 11 on a monster machine is sluggish by comparison -- I can feel it drawing each window I open.
  • AshamedCaptain 3y ago
    I was just having the argument the other that dragging windows on Haiku on a plain old unaccelerated framebuffer just feels an order of magnitude faster than dragging windows around on Windows 11 with all acceleration enabled. On a 5K monitor. Windows is not setting a very high bar these days.
• rsaxvc 3y ago
  USB support even.