5 ms·
That would be awful. No more neuro covers? No more Hitler singing?
by thriftwy 3y ago
That would be awful. No more neuro covers? No more Hitler singing?
- dvngnt_ 3y agoThe rights would apply throughout a person’s lifetime and, for their estate, 70 years after their death. The bill includes an exception for using digital duplicates for parodies, satire, and criticism
- pixl97 3y agoEvery day draws us closer to The Right to Read world. If someone is copying and selling your work as created by you, that is one thing. Sounding like you, well guess what, your voice isn't copyrightable, and really in I see no world in which we'd want that. Moreso, this is going to end up in lawsuits like we saw in the open source world in the 2000s in the SCO vs Linux debacle. "That voice sounds kinda like me, so it must have been trained on my data!"
- sbassi 3y agoHitler's heir won't sue anybody, they didn't do it even when copyright for them was current.
- thriftwy 3y agoBut what if I want band A to cover song B for me? Trivial to do with neural networks.
- nickthegreek 3y agoI want this so bad. Take my playlist and jumble up the artists and songs.