4 ms·
> you should probably just be using the best that's available (OpenAI). Sure, if you want to let a monopoly have all the added value while you get to keep the
by littlestymaar 3y ago
> you should probably just be using the best that's available (OpenAI).
Sure, if you want to let a monopoly have all the added value while you get to keep the rest you can do that.
Just make sure you're never successful enough to inspire them though, otherwise you're dead the next minute. Oops.
- wrsh07 3y ago5k monthly revenue (or even 100k) isn't big enough for OpenAI to care. It's barely big enough for a competitor to care. I suspect that OpenAI doesn't have the bandwidth to build most uses of ai and so is in the bill gates platform land: the ecosystem should be pocketing more money than the owner of the platform is.
- littlestymaar 3y agoNow
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- wrsh07 3y agoWas this an accident? If it's a complete thought intending to say "for now" - eh, I would bet on it for quite a while. They don't care about your little use case. It's possible gpt next or next++ ends up making whatever work you do trivial, but it's likely you'll still have customers