4 ms·
If you're talking about United States v. Antoine Jones, the result the Court reached is not what you describe. The Court ruled that a warrant is required to ins
by timsally 15y ago
If you're talking about United States v. Antoine Jones, the result the Court reached is not what you describe. The Court ruled that a warrant is required to install a GPS device on a car because the act of installing the device is a seizure (however brief). Unfortunately Kennedy hid behind this narrow ruling; no finding was made on the broader issues of the 4th Amendment and electronic surveillance.