4 ms·
Probably all three: 1) They hiring too talent to make their models as efficient as possible. 2) They have a sweetheart deal with MS. 3) They’re better funded
by 4death4 3y ago
Probably all three:
1) They hiring too talent to make their models as efficient as possible.
2) They have a sweetheart deal with MS.
3) They’re better funded than everyone else and bringing in substantial revenue.
- smachiz 3y agodeleted
- ryduh 3y agoIs this a guess or is it informed by facts?
- sebzim4500 3y agoAre just suggesting this as an option or do you have evidence that it is true?
- ugjka 3y agoThey are also trying to lobby the government for AI "regulation" in order limit any competitors ability achieve OpenAI's level
- wkat4242 3y agoThey basically are MS by now. Everyone at Microsoft I work with literally calls it an 'aquisition'. Even though they only own a share. It's pretty clear what their plans are.
- imchillyb 3y ago> Microsoft will reportedly get a 75% share of OpenAI's profits until it makes back the money on its investment, after which the company would assume a 49% stake in OpenAI. 49% isn't _just_ a share, it's a significant portion of the company.
- wkat4242 3y agoIt's what we call a non-controlling interest. Definitely not something that qualifies as an acquisition.
- imchillyb 3y agoOf course, and it's also not _just_ a share, which is the comment I was responding to. 49% of a company's outstanding public shares is a significant portion. It's 2% away from controlling, and a fun merger event.