3 ms·
Which way was your comment suposed to be interpreted? Was it just a "out of context comment" on something that poped up in your mind as you read the text?
by reliablereason 3y ago
Which way was your comment suposed to be interpreted?
Was it just a "out of context comment" on something that poped up in your mind as you read the text?
- downvotetruth 3y ago"There will be an exact point at which a certain molecule has interacted with another molecule" statement is contradictory with the uncertainty associated with time as described by quantum mechanics and molecular interactions due to Brownian motion. Material that is returned when searching for those topics will better answer your further questions about them and those above than I here.
- reliablereason 3y agoThe uncertainty principle is about unavoidable measurement "errors" (measurements that can’t be done). If you are going to measure the time (or anything) you will always get finite values. Finite values are not irrational. Either one talks about the underlying physics or about the measurements of it. If one talks about the underlying physics all bets are of, it is unmeasurable by definition. Anything is possible bellow the measurement threshold(including irrational numbers). If one talks about the measurements you will always get finite rational values.
- pyinstallwoes 3y agoI applaud your ontological reasoning and understanding of _things_.