4 ms·
They raised $200M and last raised at $1.5B. Depending on liquidation preference clauses I don't think any employee outside the founders will make much from thi
by tempsy 3y ago
They raised $200M and last raised at $1.5B.
Depending on liquidation preference clauses I don't think any employee outside the founders will make much from this sale.
- runako 3y agoWould you mind sharing the ballpark arithmetic that leads to this conclusion?
- darig 3y ago[dead]
- lmeyerov 3y agomost of the employees came in at later rounds, so play it out. ex: They'd get say $100K in options on paper, but the pitch would be the company is high-growth, so expectation of 2X, 10X, 20X, etc over next few years. That $100K is really $200K next year, $2M the year after, etc. Except they sold the company at a ~flat multiple over the valuation. If employees got RSUs, then at least they made say $65K after short-term capital gains (30%+). But if as options... no growth over the latest valuation's strike price, so nothing. $65K is not $200K and certainly not $2M.. and $0 is even worse. FWIW, I'm a happy customer, am happy for the founders, and hope the new features keep rolling out through the acquisition -- our usage of Loom grows every month! The issue here is not the founders, but HR & VC. This is why joining companies with high valuations is a big risk as the VC's have already set inflated prices that ate your potential payout -- you earn on growth over the strike price at time of joining -- and these high markup companies have a lot of revenue to grow into.
- nlavezzo 3y agoThat’s not how option pricing works. This is a private company, and it was raising money using preferred shares. The employee shares underlying the options would have been common stock. At least once a year the company would be required to do a 409a valuation to set the FMV for those underlying common shares and thus the strike price for any options in the next year or less. The 409a valuation for common shares is pretty much always going to be significantly discounted vs preferred for a variety of reasons like lack of liquidation preference, lack of liquidity, etc. These discounts are often 50% plus, but the shares likely have a 1:1 economic value to other share classes in a sale, except the most recent preferred that get to use their preference. Anyways the reality is going to be determined by each company’s details, but option strike prices at private companies are generally much lower than the current going price for preferred due to the discounts provided by the 409a valuation.
- toomanyrichers 3y agoYes. For instance, at an early stage company I co-founded, we saw 409A of 10% of the most recent priced round.
- lmeyerov 3y agoyes, this is very much stage-specific by the time of these $100M+ rounds for $1B unicorns to hire a lot of people, the 90% discount is long gone
- birken 3y agoIt might not be a 90% discount but it still will be a >50% discount
- lmeyerov 3y agofor companies raising 9 figure later-stage rounds? that's not obvious to me and relevant to this case, often the investor will do a higher valuation (artificially minting a unicorn etc) for optics/vanity reasons, which eats an additional 1+ years of future growth, eliminating the relevance of a discount here and for folks who many not have followed terms above: investors get preferred shares, with rights over these discounted common shares. These include things like veto rights over acquisitions, first money out ("if $200M raised, no one else sees any $ until that $200M is paid back"), and for high-valuation unicorn rounds, often something like a participation multiple ("guaranteed extra $100M profit, so no one sees anything till $300M paid"), high interest rate on convertible debt portions, etc. So beyond the obvious dilution hit of new investors, there are a lot of these gotchas that trade a bigger bank account for heightened exit value risks to employees.
- birken 3y agoThe people who come up with 409a prices have every incentive to make it as low as possible provided it is somewhat defensible to the IRS. I assure you they can get more creative than saying that the last preferred price was at $X, therefore our hands are tied and the common must be close to that. They can take into consideration the preferred preferences, the current state of the business, the time since the last round, etc. For example, the 409a value can keep going down and down if the value of the business is (defensibly) going down and down, regardless of the last fundraising round.
- Aurornis 3y agoThey raised $200M and sold for $1B. Options from the last raise would be under water, but they operated for years before that raise. There are likely a lot of employees doing reasonably well.
- abofh 3y agoThe amount they raised is meaningless to an option holder, only the valuation. If the employee joined at the 1.5B valuation, they got nothing
- sushid 3y agoNot nothing, just a fat haircut of ~40%, right?
- shuckles 3y agoNothing is the best case (if they didn't exercise options). You're right: some lost money on the transaction if they did exercise, outside special consideration.
- theogravity 3y agoIn some cases, they probably have lost money if they early exercised at that valuation.
- mattpratt 3y agoThey wouldn't have exercised at that valuation. The options would be priced based on the 409a, which would be much much less than 1.5B.
- theogravity 3y agoDepends on when the 409a was performed and when the exercise happened. When the startup I work at got our Series A, a new 409a was done and increased the share price by roughly the same multiple of the new valuation, and now I have a wide spread for AMT should I exercise my options because of the new 409a. So it's possible for employees to have joined after the new 409a when it was valued at 1.5bln and early exercised against that value.
- andyjsong 3y agoMaybe: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/philhaslett_tendies-activity-7118308684660645888-Tyax https://www.linkedin.com/posts/philhaslett_tendies-activity-...
- hacknews20 3y agoWow - you are wrong.