3 ms·
I didn't in the actual math. I just wrote with the slash to make it easier to read than wattsecond. You'll see I did do 1 watt * 1 second. Please stop being so
by vel0city 3y ago
I didn't in the actual math. I just wrote with the slash to make it easier to read than wattsecond. You'll see I did do 1 watt * 1 second. Please stop being so pedantic. I edited it for you though.
Either way, I (and most other humans) will probably continue to use watthours instead of joules for most things, as most people will probably agree 5W for 3 hours makes more sense as 15Wh instead of 54kJ. Joules are too small a measurement for a lot of practical applications. Needing to multiply by 60 or 3600 to get to minutes and hours gets frustrating.
- Joker_vD 3y ago...can you please point me at the place in my original comment where I am arguing for using joules instead of watt-hours?
- vel0city 3y agoI took your original comment as a complaint about using watthours in general, as watts are already a unit of speed. Implying you'd prefer to not use watthours. I guess I was wrong on reading it that way.