3 ms·
It's not clear to me where the mistake is. Almost everything uses Li-ion batteries with nominal voltage of 3.7V, so if it's mAh, 3.7V is assumed. else if Wh, im
by numpad0 3y ago
It's not clear to me where the mistake is. Almost everything uses Li-ion batteries with nominal voltage of 3.7V, so if it's mAh, 3.7V is assumed. else if Wh, implies raw_terminal_voltage != 3.7. mAh ratings normalized for 3.7V are comparable, and Wh ratings are comparable too. It's also probably not wise to connect mAh rated battery to Wh rated ones(if it ever could be).
In electrical design, electrical current(A) matters to trace widths and wire thickness selection; voltage(V) matters, separately, in matching supported voltage ranges, and also insulation for components. Total wattage(W) do not tell either of the story. It will concern me if a single strand of 32AWG wire was supposed to carry 10kA, or two studs 1.27mm apart would be energized to 10kVDC, but same for 10W of power at unknown current or voltage... I won't be so sure.
mAh is fine. So long you don't mix different techs. Like standard alkaline, NiMH, and Li-ion, in a same bucket. Which you don't anyway.
- tuetuopay 3y agoyou missed the point. the laptop's battery is not 3.7v but more likely to be in the 20-ish volt region because the cells are in series. the assumption of 3.7v is plain wrong.
- numpad0 3y agoLaptop batteries are Wh marked always, because there are 4, 6, 9 cell options, always in series. Power banks are 99Wh or fractions thereof due to airline safety requirements. If you want to charge a laptop with a 4S 11Wh slim pack using a 20100mAh battery with 20V/3A USB-PD out, that's 4 times worth laptop capacity...? Who cares? Is that why you want everything to be Wh marked?
- wepple 3y agoThe mistake is that many (most?) devices use batteries in series as well as parallel. So as soon as someone builds a 2S battery with nominal 7.4v, mAh is useless as a sole datapoint