3 ms·
might depend on the books and the magazine. The Atlantic, New Yorker and McSweeny's all seem to be doing okay. Byte, Kilobaud Microcomputing and Starlog all we
by retrocryptid 3y ago
might depend on the books and the magazine. The Atlantic, New Yorker and McSweeny's all seem to be doing okay. Byte, Kilobaud Microcomputing and Starlog all went the way of the dodo. Some authors are surprisingly thin on the ground (Burroughs) while some are still easy to find (McCarthy).
I think it depends on what you're looking for. Just was thinking I still have Wired and Fantasy and Science Fiction subscriptions. The latter has, apparently, had some financial scares in the past, but is still here. I was going to say thr Magazines that survive provide "evergreen" content, but Wired has found its niche for largely ephemeral articles. Same with Rolling Stone.
I think I have a problem with your premise. I don't think magazines are collapsing in general, yet many have. Many of the collapsed magazines I'm thinking of made the leap to a web page where costs were lower. Some even survived (Boing Boing comes to mind.) But they're not all gone.
- instagraham 3y agoI think there should be considered a distinction between a magazine's content (produced over a week or a month, with time to pause and consider the news cycle) and everyday journalism content (a newspaper or new site perpetually striving to put things out now). Magazines, at least the right ones, had a quality edge over their more rushed peers. But when you turn magazine content online, you lose a lot of that edge. One because a lot of magazines digitised very poorly, and ceded informational space to far more digitally native players (Vice, buzzfeed, clickbait news sites). Two because a magazine story may look the same as a quick 800-word content sludge I could churn out in an hour. Is there a way for magazine experience to be made more premium in a digital space?