3 ms·

For anyone else curious, Loom raised $205M with the last round at a $1.5B valuation. This deal is for $975M in cash. Sources: - https://www.crunchbase.com/org

For anyone else curious, Loom raised $205M with the last round at a $1.5B valuation. This deal is for $975M in cash. Sources: - https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/loom https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/loom - https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevenli1/2022/03/14/nearly-broke-to-15-billion-how-he-built-loom-and-grew-it-to-14-million-users/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevenli1/2022/03/14/nearly-bro... - https://twitter.com/andrew__reed/status/1712458243883110599?s=46&t=AyPpMAhv4dl5_SNCRuKiSA https://twitter.com/andrew__reed/status/1712458243883110599?... (Edit: formatting)

pyrophane 3y ago
Without knowing the specific of their last round, does anyone have an idea of what selling at roughly 2/3 of their previous valuation likely means for their employees? I know that VCs typically have some kind of "upside protection" in later rounds that guarantees them first money out in the event of a sale on some multiple of their investment, but I don't know what terms are common.
- djbusby 3y ago
  Frequently Investors and Founders get money before Employees. Investors frequently have clauses (warrants/ratchet) to increase their position if the sale wasn't at some threshold, which will affect (to downside) the basis for Employees payout. If the Employee thought the stock was at $150/share at 1.5B they will get less than $97 on payout.
- gangstead 3y ago
  The startup system is pretty rigged against accidentally making anyone rich who is a mere employee. That money is for the investors, not the working class. The days of the office assistant making millions on stock are long gone. There's options with huge tax implications, long vesting periods, the investors get preferred stock, they get guaranteed multiples, if there's a down round there's a carve-out that you won't be part of. Not only do the investors have priority shares over employees, each investor can negotiate a guaranteed multiple. For example if they put in 100 million for 10% ownership but also had a 5X multiple guarantee and a sale price of 1 billion then the 500 million they walk away with ends up being 50% of the sale price. That part of the agreement isn't made public as far as I know.
  - neilv 3y ago
    If I want to found a VC-funded startup for which a successful exit is much more fair to the employees, how do I do that? Will the investors insist that it all come out of the founders' percentage of the pie, or can I argue that the better-incentived employees mean a bigger and more likely pie, so VC terms shoudl be less grabby? Will VCs react negatively to "being soft on" employees, even if it all comes out of founders' slice? Do early employees get ISOs, other options, RSUs, or something else?
    - killingtime74 3y ago
      First find a VC fund that agrees with you
    - cj 3y ago
      > how do I do that? The only good answer to this is 1) don't raise more VC money than you really need, and 2) don’t raise money at a valuation way above what your company is actually worth. The problem in the scenario here is that they sold for below the valuation of their last funding round, and the size of their last funding round was ginormous. When you raise hundreds of millions at a $1.5b valuation, you’re expected to sell above $1.5b at some point in the future. Any less and you didn’t live up to the opportunity that you pitched investors (and the financial outcomes for everyone deteriorates when you sell for way less than your valuation).
      - neilv 3y ago
        Can I still attract VC, if I'm arguing for more modest valuations than competing lottery-ticket startups are? Or do I have to look like much more a traditional fundamentals investment, than a semirandom lottery ticket (or growth scam to exit)?
        CitrusFruits 3y ago
        Not an expert here, but I have worked at a couple startups. The answer I would give is probably not: VCs basically work on a premise like this: 1 in 25 investments will return 100x, 5 in 25 will make they're money back, and the rest are just a wash. The only way the make money is if the company is mega successful, so they're not really interested if that's not a possibility. That being said, not every person at a VC is going to be super greedy or anything like that, it's just the nature of the business model for venture capital.
- speculator14 3y ago
  A 1x liquidation preference (meaning investors get their money back before employees and other investors “below them in the capital stack” get anything) is most common. A 1.5x preference is less common. A 2x preference is rare in VC (more common in growth equity). Anything more than that is extremely rare, and a startup that was hot at the time (meaning multiple investors were competing to invest) would likely not give investors anything more. A 5x pref is unheard of. There are other types of preferences too - google “participating preferred stock” to learn more.
- andrewstuart 3y ago
  I'm listening to the audiobook of "Venture Deals: Be Smarter Than Your Lawyer and Venture Capitalist " https://www.amazon.com.au/Venture-Deals-Smarter-Lawyer-Capitalist-dp-1119594820/dp/1119594820/ref=dp_ob_title_bk https://www.amazon.com.au/Venture-Deals-Smarter-Lawyer-Capit... It's worth listening to if you want to understand this stuff better. Having just listened to this book, I would guess that this sale has not been a great outcome for the founder and employees.
wharfjumper 3y ago
So someone spent $205m in 2021 and got $133m back in 2023? My guess is that Atlassian does a similar write down in a few years time. I hope the winners in this deal try to make the world a better place.
- ec109685 3y ago
  No, they likely had a liquidation preference so at least got their money back in 2023.

pyrophane 3y ago

Without knowing the specific of their last round, does anyone have an idea of what selling at roughly 2/3 of their previous valuation likely means for their employees? I know that VCs typically have some kind of "upside protection" in later rounds that guarantees them first money out in the event of a sale on some multiple of their investment, but I don't know what terms are common.

djbusby 3y ago
Frequently Investors and Founders get money before Employees. Investors frequently have clauses (warrants/ratchet) to increase their position if the sale wasn't at some threshold, which will affect (to downside) the basis for Employees payout. If the Employee thought the stock was at $150/share at 1.5B they will get less than $97 on payout.
gangstead 3y ago
The startup system is pretty rigged against accidentally making anyone rich who is a mere employee. That money is for the investors, not the working class. The days of the office assistant making millions on stock are long gone. There's options with huge tax implications, long vesting periods, the investors get preferred stock, they get guaranteed multiples, if there's a down round there's a carve-out that you won't be part of. Not only do the investors have priority shares over employees, each investor can negotiate a guaranteed multiple. For example if they put in 100 million for 10% ownership but also had a 5X multiple guarantee and a sale price of 1 billion then the 500 million they walk away with ends up being 50% of the sale price. That part of the agreement isn't made public as far as I know.
- neilv 3y ago
  If I want to found a VC-funded startup for which a successful exit is much more fair to the employees, how do I do that? Will the investors insist that it all come out of the founders' percentage of the pie, or can I argue that the better-incentived employees mean a bigger and more likely pie, so VC terms shoudl be less grabby? Will VCs react negatively to "being soft on" employees, even if it all comes out of founders' slice? Do early employees get ISOs, other options, RSUs, or something else?
  - killingtime74 3y ago
    First find a VC fund that agrees with you
  - cj 3y ago
    > how do I do that? The only good answer to this is 1) don't raise more VC money than you really need, and 2) don’t raise money at a valuation way above what your company is actually worth. The problem in the scenario here is that they sold for below the valuation of their last funding round, and the size of their last funding round was ginormous. When you raise hundreds of millions at a $1.5b valuation, you’re expected to sell above $1.5b at some point in the future. Any less and you didn’t live up to the opportunity that you pitched investors (and the financial outcomes for everyone deteriorates when you sell for way less than your valuation).
    - neilv 3y ago
      Can I still attract VC, if I'm arguing for more modest valuations than competing lottery-ticket startups are? Or do I have to look like much more a traditional fundamentals investment, than a semirandom lottery ticket (or growth scam to exit)?
      - CitrusFruits 3y ago
        Not an expert here, but I have worked at a couple startups. The answer I would give is probably not: VCs basically work on a premise like this: 1 in 25 investments will return 100x, 5 in 25 will make they're money back, and the rest are just a wash. The only way the make money is if the company is mega successful, so they're not really interested if that's not a possibility. That being said, not every person at a VC is going to be super greedy or anything like that, it's just the nature of the business model for venture capital.
speculator14 3y ago
A 1x liquidation preference (meaning investors get their money back before employees and other investors “below them in the capital stack” get anything) is most common. A 1.5x preference is less common. A 2x preference is rare in VC (more common in growth equity). Anything more than that is extremely rare, and a startup that was hot at the time (meaning multiple investors were competing to invest) would likely not give investors anything more. A 5x pref is unheard of. There are other types of preferences too - google “participating preferred stock” to learn more.
andrewstuart 3y ago
I'm listening to the audiobook of "Venture Deals: Be Smarter Than Your Lawyer and Venture Capitalist " https://www.amazon.com.au/Venture-Deals-Smarter-Lawyer-Capitalist-dp-1119594820/dp/1119594820/ref=dp_ob_title_bk https://www.amazon.com.au/Venture-Deals-Smarter-Lawyer-Capit... It's worth listening to if you want to understand this stuff better. Having just listened to this book, I would guess that this sale has not been a great outcome for the founder and employees.

wharfjumper 3y ago

So someone spent $205m in 2021 and got $133m back in 2023? My guess is that Atlassian does a similar write down in a few years time. I hope the winners in this deal try to make the world a better place.

ec109685 3y ago
No, they likely had a liquidation preference so at least got their money back in 2023.