3 ms·
+1 for the fast compile time. TurboPascal was not a marketing name, it was that fast, including my old 386 machine. But TBH, nowaday's compilers do so much mor
by wiz21c 3y ago
+1 for the fast compile time. TurboPascal was not a marketing name, it was that fast, including my old 386 machine.
But TBH, nowaday's compilers do so much more, I'll happily trade compile time for that !