4 ms·

Sega didn't see 3D coming ? What about Virtua Racing (1992!) ?

by wiz21c 3y ago

KingOfCoders 3y ago
Yes you're right, my wording wasn't exact. I've meant 3D taking over the home market (and arcade market) and killing 2D plattform games and RPGs. Sega was very successful running "3D" games on 2D hardware (that could scale sprites, like Outrun or Space Harrier). So they were aware of 3D from early on. But they've released the Saturn with a main 2D focus, squeezed out some 3D games (Panzer Dragoon, Nights into Dreams, Tomb Raider, Burning Rangers and some arcade conversions) - the takeover was going on, people realized, with Mario 64 and Wipeout for example - and then added 3D hardware to the Dreamcast. But if they had anticipated the taking over of 3D, the Saturn would have been the Dreamcast (or not, I think my first PC 3D card was a Voodoo and that was after the Saturn). The first 3D I remember having played was Major Havoc or I robot - so yes there were "real" 3D games in the market, but 3D completly took over the home market, except handheld like the Gameboy/Advanced/DS/... (I think the 2D revival came with the indy developer movement, but I'm not sure). Also see e.G. the transition from Bards Tale 3D (small window) to Dungeon Master 3D (main window, 3D interaction) and then Ultima Underworld 3D (all in, tilt, up/down) as an example of 3Dification of games and genres.
- anthk 3y ago
  Sega had Scud Race. It had 3D mainly in arcades.
  - mojo74 3y ago
    Ah scud race. I'll never forget finding that machine in a bowling alley arcade and noticing the coin feeder wasn't closed. Surreptitiously opening it to find a little button that could be pressed to automatically add a credit for free each time. That was one Saturday I'll never get back and I don't care.
- hirako2000 3y ago
  Still quite inexact. Sega released Saturn as a full fledged, 3D focused hardware. A year before the PlayStation 1 was out. Some chronological refresher: Sega had already been successful in making arcade 3D games and were the first to effectively transition true 3D to the home markets with multiple early flagship releases such as Virtual Fighter, beautifully ported to the home console. The reason not many decent 3D games were shipped on Saturn was not down to the hardware capabilities or goal from sega to embrace expected 3D market demands. It was rather due to the horrific developer experience. It was so terribly difficult to program it, only those at sega were comfortable with it, if that. Saturn's hardware architecture complexity, having multiple CPUs, and other design aspects prove bad choice as it jeopardised 3rd party game developers productivity. Words were that most games shipped leveraging a single CPU given how obscure dual cpu programming was. Ironically Sega designed a more powerful machine than the PS1 and got it out a whole year earlier, yet games on PS1 were significantly superior. All down to ease of development. Wipeout was an early game on PS1 and indeed among many other popular games sealed the fact home gaming would be 3D. But sega had already produced a full fledged 3D capable Saturn, they didn't wait to see wipeout in 1995/1996, or Mario 64 another 2 years later. Saturn was capable of running wipeout 2097, metal gear solid, grand tourismo, and other late PS1 games that pushed the ps1 to its limits. But it missed the momentum and studios were not anymore invested in the saturn. Its marketshare kept shrinking. what the Dreamcast got added was primarily developer friendly features, the rest was simply leaps forward in compute power, especially on the GPU. Bump mapping if I'm not mistaken was supported by the Dreamcast first among home consoles. It was not "added" 3D, for sega that was its 2nd generation of 3D focused hardware, also their 2nd attempt, both ultimately failed for different reasons.
  - deleted 3y ago
    [deleted]
  - KingOfCoders 3y ago
    The Saturn had two graphics chips VDP1/VDP2, where on one you could draw (distorted) sprites and on the other large planes e.g. for backgrounds [0]. If you'd implemented a z-Buffer in software you could sort these sprites to draw them in the right sequence to use the distorted sprites as 4-corner polygons to render 3d models. The Dreamcast added a 3D GPU with the PowerVR2. [0] https://www.copetti.org/writings/consoles/sega-saturn/#graphics https://www.copetti.org/writings/consoles/sega-saturn/#graph...
- phire 3y ago
  You are forgetting the Sega Model 1 and Sega Model 2 arcade platforms. So many great 3D games (Virtua Fighter, Virtua Racing, Daytona USA) Sega's problem wasn't that it didn't see 3D coming. They did, despite the common claims on the internet, the Saturn was designed to be a 3D capable console, with dedicated 3D hardware. Sega's problem is that they bet on the wrong 3D technology. Like Sega's arcade systems. the Saturn was designed for quads, and could only do forwards texture mapping (which doesn't allow for UV coordinates). While the playstation went for triangles and inverse texture mapping. It turns out that was the correct direction, and the whole industry settled on that as a standard. All game engines and tooling would assume triangles. To make things worse, the Sega's hardware 3D implementation wasn't that good even at the techniques it was trying to implement.
  - KingOfCoders 3y ago
    "[...] and Daytona was great too" "You are forgetting [...] Daytona USA"
    - phire 3y ago
      I mean the arcade version of Daytona USA, which ran on a dedicated 3D arcade hardware (The Sega Model 2) that predated the Saturn by 2-3 years. Part of the reason why the Saturn port of Dayton USA was so good, is because the game was designed for the Model 2 hardware, and the Saturn's 3D capabilities were cost-optimised versions of the Model 2 3D capabilities. VDP1 was designed to do 3D. It's not just a 2D sprite engine that developers later tricked into doing 3D, it was absolutely intentional that it would be used for 3D from the very start. the fact the 3D quads could also be used to show thousands of 2D sprites with full scaling/rotation/distorting was more of a intentional bonus of the design. Yes, Sega did miss a trick by also dedicated a bunch of the silicon budget to 2D-only capabilities. VDP2's four layers of scrolling backgrounds plus two layers of mode-7 style "3D planes" are pretty useless for 3D work. They should have dropped VDP2 entirely and and focused on making VDP1 more powerful. When games were actually designed around the Saturn's 3D capabilities, the results were pretty good. Daytona is great, Tomb Raider is another great. Some games went further, going out of their way to adjust their game design so they could take advantage of VDP2's 3D planes. That's the major reason why Panzer Dragoon looks so good, the water is a 3D VDP2 layer. The skybox too, but that's reasonably common technique in Saturn games.
broast 3y ago
As i understand 3D was considered an afterthought for the Sega Saturn, their 1995 flagship console, only adding a separate processor for 3d late into the design. This made the 3d capabilities of the Saturn very hard to program for.

Sega didn't see 3D coming ? What about Virtua Racing (1992!) ?

by wiz21c 3y ago

Sega didn't see 3D coming ? What about Virtua Racing (1992!) ?

Yes you're right, my wording wasn't exact. I've meant 3D taking over the home market (and arcade market) and killing 2D plattform games and RPGs. Sega was very successful running "3D" games on 2D hardware (that could scale sprites, like Outrun or Space Harrier). So they were aware of 3D from early on. But they've released the Saturn with a main 2D focus, squeezed out some 3D games (Panzer Dragoon, Nights into Dreams, Tomb Raider, Burning Rangers and some arcade conversions) - the takeover was going on, people realized, with Mario 64 and Wipeout for example - and then added 3D hardware to the Dreamcast. But if they had anticipated the taking over of 3D, the Saturn would have been the Dreamcast (or not, I think my first PC 3D card was a Voodoo and that was after the Saturn). The first 3D I remember having played was Major Havoc or I robot - so yes there were "real" 3D games in the market, but 3D completly took over the home market, except handheld like the Gameboy/Advanced/DS/... (I think the 2D revival came with the indy developer movement, but I'm not sure). Also see e.G. the transition from Bards Tale 3D (small window) to Dungeon Master 3D (main window, 3D interaction) and then Ultima Underworld 3D (all in, tilt, up/down) as an example of 3Dification of games and genres.

anthk 3y ago
Sega had Scud Race. It had 3D mainly in arcades.
- mojo74 3y ago
  Ah scud race. I'll never forget finding that machine in a bowling alley arcade and noticing the coin feeder wasn't closed. Surreptitiously opening it to find a little button that could be pressed to automatically add a credit for free each time. That was one Saturday I'll never get back and I don't care.
hirako2000 3y ago
Still quite inexact. Sega released Saturn as a full fledged, 3D focused hardware. A year before the PlayStation 1 was out. Some chronological refresher: Sega had already been successful in making arcade 3D games and were the first to effectively transition true 3D to the home markets with multiple early flagship releases such as Virtual Fighter, beautifully ported to the home console. The reason not many decent 3D games were shipped on Saturn was not down to the hardware capabilities or goal from sega to embrace expected 3D market demands. It was rather due to the horrific developer experience. It was so terribly difficult to program it, only those at sega were comfortable with it, if that. Saturn's hardware architecture complexity, having multiple CPUs, and other design aspects prove bad choice as it jeopardised 3rd party game developers productivity. Words were that most games shipped leveraging a single CPU given how obscure dual cpu programming was. Ironically Sega designed a more powerful machine than the PS1 and got it out a whole year earlier, yet games on PS1 were significantly superior. All down to ease of development. Wipeout was an early game on PS1 and indeed among many other popular games sealed the fact home gaming would be 3D. But sega had already produced a full fledged 3D capable Saturn, they didn't wait to see wipeout in 1995/1996, or Mario 64 another 2 years later. Saturn was capable of running wipeout 2097, metal gear solid, grand tourismo, and other late PS1 games that pushed the ps1 to its limits. But it missed the momentum and studios were not anymore invested in the saturn. Its marketshare kept shrinking. what the Dreamcast got added was primarily developer friendly features, the rest was simply leaps forward in compute power, especially on the GPU. Bump mapping if I'm not mistaken was supported by the Dreamcast first among home consoles. It was not "added" 3D, for sega that was its 2nd generation of 3D focused hardware, also their 2nd attempt, both ultimately failed for different reasons.
- deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]
- KingOfCoders 3y ago
  The Saturn had two graphics chips VDP1/VDP2, where on one you could draw (distorted) sprites and on the other large planes e.g. for backgrounds [0]. If you'd implemented a z-Buffer in software you could sort these sprites to draw them in the right sequence to use the distorted sprites as 4-corner polygons to render 3d models. The Dreamcast added a 3D GPU with the PowerVR2. [0] https://www.copetti.org/writings/consoles/sega-saturn/#graphics https://www.copetti.org/writings/consoles/sega-saturn/#graph...
phire 3y ago
You are forgetting the Sega Model 1 and Sega Model 2 arcade platforms. So many great 3D games (Virtua Fighter, Virtua Racing, Daytona USA) Sega's problem wasn't that it didn't see 3D coming. They did, despite the common claims on the internet, the Saturn was designed to be a 3D capable console, with dedicated 3D hardware. Sega's problem is that they bet on the wrong 3D technology. Like Sega's arcade systems. the Saturn was designed for quads, and could only do forwards texture mapping (which doesn't allow for UV coordinates). While the playstation went for triangles and inverse texture mapping. It turns out that was the correct direction, and the whole industry settled on that as a standard. All game engines and tooling would assume triangles. To make things worse, the Sega's hardware 3D implementation wasn't that good even at the techniques it was trying to implement.
- KingOfCoders 3y ago
  "[...] and Daytona was great too" "You are forgetting [...] Daytona USA"
  - phire 3y ago
    I mean the arcade version of Daytona USA, which ran on a dedicated 3D arcade hardware (The Sega Model 2) that predated the Saturn by 2-3 years. Part of the reason why the Saturn port of Dayton USA was so good, is because the game was designed for the Model 2 hardware, and the Saturn's 3D capabilities were cost-optimised versions of the Model 2 3D capabilities. VDP1 was designed to do 3D. It's not just a 2D sprite engine that developers later tricked into doing 3D, it was absolutely intentional that it would be used for 3D from the very start. the fact the 3D quads could also be used to show thousands of 2D sprites with full scaling/rotation/distorting was more of a intentional bonus of the design. Yes, Sega did miss a trick by also dedicated a bunch of the silicon budget to 2D-only capabilities. VDP2's four layers of scrolling backgrounds plus two layers of mode-7 style "3D planes" are pretty useless for 3D work. They should have dropped VDP2 entirely and and focused on making VDP1 more powerful. When games were actually designed around the Saturn's 3D capabilities, the results were pretty good. Daytona is great, Tomb Raider is another great. Some games went further, going out of their way to adjust their game design so they could take advantage of VDP2's 3D planes. That's the major reason why Panzer Dragoon looks so good, the water is a 3D VDP2 layer. The skybox too, but that's reasonably common technique in Saturn games.

broast 3y ago

As i understand 3D was considered an afterthought for the Sega Saturn, their 1995 flagship console, only adding a separate processor for 3d late into the design. This made the 3d capabilities of the Saturn very hard to program for.