> not really relevant to the discussion. You're on a throwaway, so correct me if I am wrong, but this is your first comment in this discussion? How is it irrel

> not really relevant to the discussion. You're on a throwaway, so correct me if I am wrong, but this is your first comment in this discussion? How is it irrelevant enough for you to insist such a thing? Distributing in such a way that illegitimate copies disappear but your margins are affected as if the piracy were there all the same is useful to think about in this discussion, because it has happened and you can study it somewhat. To your point on copyright, unaffordable things aren't always entertainment, though it would be nice if that were the case. Feeling that the majority of content is frivolous entertainment is just a feeling; a feel-good feeling that trivializes any drawbacks to the copyright system.