16 ms·

So we shouldn’t have consequences for our actions? Are you saying I don’t understand forgiveness for mistakes? That is why I said the student groups that retrac

So we shouldn’t have consequences for our actions? Are you saying I don’t understand forgiveness for mistakes? That is why I said the student groups that retracted their statements should be spared, but this is saying you should be able to run into a crowded theater and yell fire with no consequence. Also like usual with the over reaction. This isn’t a thought crime. It’s simply amplifying their own hate speech. If they don’t like the attention so much maybe they shouldn’t be making such heinous statements. This is just the community reacting to something you are I guess are fine with. And good job trying to smear me instead of responding with facts! edit for clarity

deleted 3y ago
[deleted]
rdtsc 3y ago
> That is why I said the student groups that retracted their statements should be spared How would being spared work though? Would the truck run the route again with crossed over, corrected names? What if someone was doxxed by mistake, run an apology list truck?
- coolhand2120 3y ago
  So if I was a former member of the KKK and someone published that they are the bad guy?
  - rdtsc 3y ago
    But what if you weren't a member and someone published it, are they the bad guy? Can they "un-publish" it?
    - coolhand2120 3y ago
      That’s not the case here. No mistake was made. And yes, typically you would issue a retraction or “unpublish” as you call it.
      - rdtsc 3y ago
        > No mistake was made. The article in question disagrees with that. > “... I’m even more appalled since many of them had nothing to do with the letter,” Furman wrote. I guess they'll have to drive the truck backwards, and with mistaken names crossed out? And if anyone was affected the truck driver will personally vouch for them in an attempt to reverse the damages.