3 ms·
There’s tons of public land that is free to access. BLM, USFWS, USFS, maybe more. But people in general don’t want that land. They want the land with paved, mai
by explaininjs 3y ago
There’s tons of public land that is free to access. BLM, USFWS, USFS, maybe more. But people in general don’t want that land. They want the land with paved, maintained trails, where there’s always a ranger around the bend to help you out of any situation you might get yourself into. And I don’t mind them paying for those privileges.
Those of us who don’t need them have plenty of land to use.
- bravoetch 3y agoRangers are federal law enforcement, not 'there to help you out of any situation you might get yourself into'. Don't talk to the police.
- whyenot 3y agoBroadly speaking, there are interpretative rangers who provide information and education about national parks and there are law enforcement rangers who exist to protect people, park features, and provide emergency services. If you don’t wish to talk to any rangers, go right ahead, but please don’t spread misinformation about them.
- davkan 3y agoRangers are a valuable resource to anyone venturing into the backcountry. I cannot count the amount of times I’ve been provided useful information and services by rangers. I’ll happily strike up a conversation with any ranger I meet. Based on your statement I’d be surprised if you’ve ever interacted with a ranger. The only people I meet who dislike rangers are the types who feel entitled to do whatever they please in the wilderness and refuse to carry a bear can when hiking through Yosemite. Take the mindless anti government sentiment elsewhere.