5 ms·
probably because AI is awful at coding anything complex but the social and communication skills these companies value so hard are actually easily done by AI. Th
by Madmallard 3y ago
probably because AI is awful at coding anything complex but the social and communication skills these companies value so hard are actually easily done by AI. The social elite are far more replaceable by text. What a world we live in.
- somewhereoutth 3y agoCoding (in the strictest sense) is a far easier and more tractable problem than anything that involves social skills.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- Madmallard 3y agonot true at all
- goodroot 3y ago> but the social and communication skills these companies value so hard are actually easily done by AI Can you expand this premise? It invalidates not just managers, but therapy, virtually any social function.
- johnea 3y agoWasn't an "AI" "therapist" the very first chat bot?
- TeMPOraL 3y ago> It invalidates not just managers, but therapy, virtually any social function. It doesn't, because it can't replace authenticity. That is, unless you never realize you're talking with an AI. But if the human connection doesn't matter for you in a given context, then yes, GPT-4 can already compete with therapy, as well as with many social functions.